Visitors to this little village by the side of the old
Great North Road often wonder about the origin of its place-name. After all, Sunderland proper lies a good
fifteen miles to the North-East of this settlement. Can the two possibly be
connected in some distant way?
Well, yes and no. By a strange coincidence, both lie adjacent to the River Wear. Moreover, both just happen to have the same place-name derivation. But that’s it, I’m afraid: there the similarities end.
its more famous namesake, is so labelled due to its being ‘sundered’ or
‘separated’ land. In the case of ‘little Sunderland Bridge Sunderland’, the village was an isolated portion of the ancient parish of
St.Oswald in Elvet to the north, from which it was separated by the
aforementioned river. One may speculate that the ‘Bridge’ bit was added to
distinguish it from ‘big’ Sunderland – perhaps.
Over the years it has also been known as ‘
Sunderland juxta Croxdale’ (juxta meaning ‘near’), and even
simply ‘Sunderland-by-the-Bridge’. The bridge, in case you’re wondering, is the
stone effort which lies nearby, and which has its roots in the 13th/14th century. Though the old river crossing is still in use, the weight of the main
road is now taken by a modern-ish metal affair – and for good measure the East
Coast Rail line also crosses the river a few yards upstream.
Would you please consider making a purchase from my e-Books4Charity website. There are currently six publications up for grabs, and the majority of every sale goes to help children's charities. Maybe you can write a booklet of your own for the website?